“If you didn’t read the book, why rate it? And why give it a 1-star rating?”
I love negative reviews. The favorable reviews could be written by
sock puppets of the author or maker, but negative reviews are written by
people who feel strongly about something and I’d like to know why. If I
think they are idiots, those negative reviews add to my confidence that
I am making a good choice. But if a product has a huge number of mostly
positive reviews, a warning might be embedded in those negative reviews
that would be hard to extract from the positives.
In the general case, a person who attempted to read a book and failed
might rate a book to warn others about their experience. You might do
this with a restaurant you didn’t eat at, if you made a reservation,
arrived slightly early, and were still not seated (or had been seated
but not yet placed an order, or whatever) an hour after the time of the
reservation. There could be any number of reasons why you were
unsuccessful at eating (failed to adhere to a dress code, restaurant
closed by the health department, visible rat dung etc.) and a person
contemplating eating at that restaurant might want to know which of
those reasons applied — but the failure to eat a meal there is no reason
why you shouldn’t post a review of your extremely negative experience.
If I were selling an historical novel about women and their intimate
relationships, I’d be looking at the Romance Novel Consuming Audience
and slavering. Copiously. But I’d also know better than to sell a book
without an emotionally satisfying ending to this audience. There are
romance novel series, but each entry has an emotionally satisfying
ending — if not an Ever After, a Consummation that was Devoutly Wished.
The reviews — positive and negative — of the book Rich Adin uses as his
example are generally quite clear that an HEA is not something that the
book will provide, yet it attracted a Romance Novel Consuming Audience
that expected on. The product was not described correctly. Usually,
books like this come with warning labels (“tearjerker” and “anguish” and
“stark” being just a few examples of words that could have provided
adequate warning). If the ride doesn’t say there are strobe lights and
someone has a seizure, they’re going to be pissed and tell all of their
neuro-diverse friends.
Here are a few examples of the negatives reviews of _Sentence to
Marriage_. A two star review by reading mom says “I wish someone would
have mentioned how the sadness just keeps going on.” She notes that it
is well-written, the characters are well developed and the story
probably accurate to history but objects to the overall length, and
“thought the details of minor events went on too long with not
contributing to the story line”. A one star review by chris83 says,
“Sentence of marriage should have been titled sentence of agony. This
book was not a romance.” And there are many, many more in which the fact
it is NOT a romance and does not have an HEA and is incredibly
depressing are the primary features of the review. These reviewers are
emphatic that they wished they’d given up sooner and gone on to read
something else — exactly the kind of information this kind of reader
needs and Amazon.com would want them to have, and which should have been
provided in the Book Description.
Complete article here.
Credit: www.the-digital-reader.com